Biometric Identity Cards
Now that Tony Blair has "reformed " the House of Lords i.e. got them eating out of his pocket , they have waved through the I.D. card scam. Another great blow for traditional English values of freedom of movement and association and individual autonomy, and another reason why every deluded politically correct right-on fool who voted for him at the previous elections should now hold down their heads in shame.
It's too late now. It will never be repealed . Revolution is now the only remedy, and revolution it will be. So long Albion and thanks, Messrs. Brown, Blunkett, Blair, Prescott, Mandelson, Blair again (our betrayed, outmanoeuvred police commissioner) Cook, Straw , and all the other traitors, and thank you to everyone who colluded at the ballot in turning this country into another state-run, corrupt, unprincipled, unpatriotic, hypocritical , sacrilegious, piece of scrap. It took 50 years.
You had issues with "Thatcherism"? Would she have supported this? You really have a doubt?
And when exactly was our vote on this critical issue ? Remember, all those who voted this government in : You brought this country "into the 21st century", and you will live to see the consequences. I know ...we're all cynics now. So now what do YOU believe in ?
Now you can laugh at Churchill, reviled yet respected. You can laugh at Shakespeare, respected yet spurned. You can laugh at the Queen, spurned yet loyal. Now you can laugh at the Privy Seal, and the Media, and the Church. You can laugh at the political process. You can laugh, too, at England . Because today it died, apparently for a handful of Muslim terrorists.
I hope you're all proud of yourselves and remember this day when you wear your little badge of Blairite allegiance.
Do not take this personally. Take it seriously. There is only one option left now. I look forward to seeing you at the barricades. Only which side will you be on?
R.B.
Crash Gordon to be Prime Minister
This is something that has been on the minds of many Brits and really needs to be addressed. However much you dislike Tony Blair many people think less of Gordon Brown. The guy will probably get into power by the back door, so he may as well make the most of it because not a living soul that i talk to from day to day actually wants him there. Bizarre? Well quite. He knows it. Labour knows it too, and Labour are also aware that they may not return to power again for some time due to the innability to listen to public opinion and sheer selfishness of their own self indulgent importance, so why is there no other real competition or fight taking place. Could it be that nobody else want's the responsibility of a party in decline. No other politician within the Labour ranks is as obnoxious as Gordon is? (excluding Prescott of course, but he has ruined his political career by becoming the laughing stock of a nation including people who have not a clue about politics... Primarily because they can't be bothered) Names that have been thrust forward to make it sound slightly democratic are John Ried, Alan Johnson, David Miliband, John McDonnell, Peter Hain, Charles Clarke Jack Straw, Hilary Benn and even Harriet Harman, but this is not concrete as yet. The reality of this debate is hidden within these names here. None of them are worthy!
Click on the picture for more on why Gordon shouldn't be PM
R
Protesters gatherered last night on the eve of Labour Party conference in Manchester
Around 30,000 people are expected to make their views known about the Government's foreign, judicial, and environmental policies that are never properly
addressed or dealt with. Good luck to them breaking the thick skinned PM who clearly
doesn't care at this stage anyway. With most of the British industry sold out to Europe by way's of cleverly disguised spin to deter away from it, legislation was ushered through the back door to feather his own and his backslapping pals' nests, probably ensuring a himself seat for the future.
R
Is France ungovernable?
Its economy is sick, its people refuse to accept much-needed reforms, there are riots on the streets, government ministers are at each others’ throats and Chirac sits brooding in the Elysée Palace like a lame-duck president...
"Within 20 years, one person out of four in France will be Muslim, and almost certainly poor and angry. So the French disease progresses. It is chronic becoming terminal. On the way toward collapse, there will be no civil war, just moments of harsh violence. The population will change. People with a high level of productivity will choose exile. People with a low level of productivity will immigrate. Jews and Christians will leave. Muslims will arrive."
More information on this article:
The Fall of France and the Multicultural World War
Read here: www.brusselsjournal.com
Read more here: www.thebusinessonline.com
R
Bin Laden Dead?
Allegedly Osama bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda leader, is dead according to a secret service report. The cause ...Typhoid. Well who knows for sure, but what i can't understand is the French defence ministry have publicaly stated that they would launch an enquiry to find out how it got out.
"The defence minister has asked that an inquiry be carried out to determine the origin of the leak that can be punished by criminal charges."
How about scrapping that idea of wasting public money and open up to the fact that it's in everyone's right and, or best interests to know. Interference from governments is at an all time high right now. Plug this, hold back that, they are all a joke. Give the people the information your scared about releasing.
Do something right for a change.
R
9-11 Documentary...
that is causing a split in opinion about the whole affair.
Make no mistake this video is a factual documentary of events regarding 9-11 and the incompetence of a Government hell bent on twisting the truth, although facts you cannot argue, some views are misrepresented. You have to appreciate that some believe that the airplanes over the Pentagon and Pennsyvania were shot down and rightly so given the correct intelligence, but the U.S. Government or any for that matter wouldn't publicly want to admit to certain acts of National Security because it's not exactly good publicity is it. Anyway i'm not going to critisize some good work. Worth watching....for your consideration.
Link to 911 Loose Change video Or watch it here:
A report i have found from the U.S government to argue this is found here, but it's very weak and you can pull it apart at the seams . In fact it's so poor there is no knowledge of who it was that wrote this for the
USINFO.STATE.ORGBy breaking down specifics about the allegations, who would be satisfied with the responce. Here are a few examples:
"The Attack on the Pentagon"
"Allegation: 9/11 Revealed suggests that American Airlines flight 77 was not hijacked and flown into the Pentagon but that, instead, “a drone Boeing 757 is used or a smaller, more manageable plane painted in American Airlines colors.”
US info's explanation:
"This theory ignores the fact that the passenger and crew remains from American Airlines flight 77 were recovered at the Pentagon crash site."Where is this proof? Sure there will be dead inside the Pentagon. None of the information has been made public. In fact here is what was released by officials,
and consider there were three cameras that could wrap this up. How about releasing that!
wikimedia.org:Pentagon_security_video.jpgAfter watching this you start to understand that they have for one reason or another removed the most important parts of the footage.
Continued:
"A team of more than 100 forensic specialists and others identified 184 of the 189 people who died in the Pentagon attack (125 from the Pentagon and 64 onboard American Airlines flight 77)."Only 64 people on board that morning.
"All but one of the passengers onboard American Airlines flight 77 was positively identified as a match with DNA samples provided by the families of the crash victims, as reported in the Washington Post on November 21, 2001. This provides irrefutable proof that American Airlines flight 77, not a drone or other aircraft, crashed into the Pentagon on September 11."One passenger from the plane wasn't identified. Surely they mean was withheld...As quoted from the Washington Post
"The fifth unidentified victim was a passenger on the hijacked plane. A spokesman for the FBI declined to disclose the name of the victim."Who's flogging who here? And why is an official government spokesperson taking information from the paper anyway? Surely they have better resources 'on tap' than the Washington Post. And what is the statement:
"This provides irrefutable proof that American Airlines flight 77, not a drone or other aircraft, crashed into the Pentagon"Does it? The International information programs..The United States information organisation uses information as proof from a press article! Here's more:
"The Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers Allegation: 9/11 Revealed suggests that the collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) towers occurred because not the terrorists flew airliners filled with jet fuel into them, but because the towers were “pre-rigged with explosives.”
U.S. info's explanation:
"Some 200 staff reviewed tens of thousands of documents, interviewed more than one thousand people, reviewed 7,000 segments of video footage and 7,000 photographs, analyzed 236 pieces of steel from the wreckage, performed laboratory tests and sophisticated computer simulations of the sequence of events that occurred from the moment the aircraft struck the towers until they collapsed. Its conclusion is that the twin towers collapsed because the impact of the planes severed and damaged support columns and dislodged fireproofing insulation coating the steel floor trusses and steel columns, which meant that the subsequent fire, which reached 1000 degrees Celsius, weakened the floors and columns to the point where they bowed and buckled, causing the towers to collapse."The files that were allegedly in WTC7? 1000 degrees? The steel wouldn't be compromised with anything less than 2000. Now who is to know how much pressure the towers were under after planes flew into them, but to make assumptions that fireproofing was 'dislodged' beggars belief.
"Allegation: Other conspiracy theorists have claimed that the fact that the towers collapsed at near a "free fall" rate indicates that explosives were needed to cause this rapid a rate of collapse."
U.S. info's explanation:
"Facts: This allegation ignores the fact that the enormous weight of the top portions of the towers completely overwhelmed the carrying capacity of the floors beneath them, which is what caused the towers to collapse at very close to a "free fall" rate. NIST's Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers states: The structure below the level of collapse initiation offered minimal resistance to the falling building mass .... The potential energy released by the downward movement of the large building mass far exceeded the capacity of the intact structure below to absorb that .... Since the stories below the level of collapse initiation provided little resistance to the tremendous energy released by the falling building mass, the building section above came down essentially in free fall .... As the stories below sequentially failed, the falling mass increased, further increasing the demand on the floors below, which were unable to arrest the moving mass. The falling mass of the building compressed the air ahead of it, much like the action of a piston, forcing material, such as smoke and debris, out the windows ...."We all know that each floor, and there were a lot of them would have some inpact on the rate at which the floors fell in a free fall state.
The Collapse of World Trade Center 7 Allegation: 9/11 Revealed suggests that the 47-story World Trade Center 7 building, which collapsed at 5:20 pm on September 11, was intentionally demolished. The primary piece of evidence for this is a comment that Mr. Larry Silverstein, who owned the World Trade Center complex, made on the September 2002 television documentary American Rebuilds. Mr. Silverstein said: I remember getting a call from the Fire Department commander, telling me they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire. I said, you know, “We've had such terrible loss of life that the smartest thing to do is just pull it.” And they made that decision to pull it and we watched the [World Trade Center 7] building collapse. 9/11 Revealed and other conspiracy theorists put forward the notion that Mr. Silverstein’s suggestion to “pull it” is slang for intentionally demolishing the WTC 7 building.
Correct but not the opinion of the USinfo.state.org...
U.S. info's explanation:
"Facts: On September 9, 2005, Mr. Dara McQuillan, a spokesman for Silverstein Properties, issued the following statement on this issue:Seven World Trade Center collapsed at 5:20 p.m. on September 11, 2001, after burning for seven hours. There were no casualties, thanks to the heroism of the Fire Department and the work of Silverstein Properties employees who evacuated tenants from the building. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) conducted a thorough investigation of the collapse of all the World Trade Center buildings. The FEMA report concluded that the collapse of Seven World Trade Center was a direct result of fires triggered by debris from the collapse of WTC Tower 1. In the afternoon of September 11, Mr. Silverstein spoke to the Fire Department Commander on site at Seven World Trade Center. The Commander told Mr. Silverstein that there were several firefighters in the building working to contain the fires. Mr. Silverstein expressed his view that the most important thing was to protect the safety of those firefighters, including, if necessary, to have them withdraw from the building. Later in the day, the Fire Commander ordered his firefighters out of the building and at 5:20 p.m. the building collapsed. No lives were lost at Seven World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. As noted above, when Mr. Silverstein was recounting these events for a television documentary he stated, “I said, you know, we've had such terrible loss of life. Maybe the smartest thing to do is to pull it.” Mr. McQuillan has stated that by “it,” Mr. Silverstein meant the contingent of firefighters remaining in the building."What i find most alarming about this line:
"Mr. Dara McQuillan, a spokesman for Silverstein Properties, issued the following statement on this issue:... Mr. Silverstein was recounting these events for a television documentary he stated, “I said, you know, we've had such terrible loss of life. Maybe the smartest thing to do is to pull it.” Mr. McQuillan has stated that by “it,” Mr. Silverstein meant the contingent of firefighters remaining in the building."So basically were getting everyone out and are going to watch it fall down naturally which is coincedently not too long from now seeing as it only burned for 7 hours. 7 whole hours! Here's the video footage of this Silverstein's statement:
blindnation.wordpress.com-the-landlord-larry-silversteinHere's who occupied the building:
wtc7.net/backgroundAnd here's how it fell:
whatreallyhappened.wtc7More:
Insider Trading Allegation: 9/11 Revealed repeats long-standing rumors of “insider trading [based] on advance warnings of the attack.”
U.S. info's explanation:
"Facts: The 9/11 Commission examined this issue in detail, stating, in The 9/11 Commission Report (p. 499): Highly publicized allegations of insider trading in advance of 9/11 generally rest on reports of unusual pre-9/11 trading activity in companies whose stock plummeted after the attacks. Some unusual trading did in fact occur, but each such trade proved to have an innocuous explanation. For example, the volume of put options – investments that pay off only when a stock drops in price – surged in the parent companies of United Airlines [UAL] on September 6 and American Airlines on September 10 – highly suspicious trading on its face. Yet, further investigation has revealed that the trading had no connection with 9/11. A single U.S.-based institutional investor with no conceivable ties to al Qaeda purchased 95 percent of the UAL puts on September 6 as part of a trading strategy that also included buying 115,000 shares of American on September 10. Similarly, much of the seemingly suspicious trading in American on September 10 was traced to a specific U.S.-based options trading newsletter, faxed to its subscribers on Sunday, September 9, which recommended these trades. These examples typify the evidence examined by the investigation. The SEC [Security and Exchange Commission] and the FBI [Federal Bureau of Investigation], aided by other agencies and the securities industry, devoted enormous resources to investigating this issue, including securing the cooperation of many foreign governments. These investigators have found that the apparently suspicious consistently proved innocuous."And there's nothing remotely disturbing about these deals or newsletters?
"A single U.S.-based institutional investor with no conceivable ties to al Qaeda purchased 95 percent of the UAL puts on September 6 as part of a trading strategy that also included buying 115,000 shares of American on September 10. Similarly, much of the seemingly suspicious trading in American on September 10 was traced to a specific U.S.-based options trading newsletter, faxed to its subscribers on Sunday, September 9, which recommended these trades."Suspicious trading would be one way of putting it... Being the whole foundation of the U.S.A And let's not forget.
There were supposedly 64 people on American Airlines flight 77 that morning. Take away 6 crew members and 5 terrorists leaves you with 53 passengers on a plane that can handle a maximum of 200 (200 incl crew). Sound investment if this flight is anything to go by.
R
9/11 Book
Over the past week I have been reading a book about 9/11. It is called 9/11 revealed.. it does come up with some interesting points. First of all I want to say that I am not for one minute saying 9/11 was anything other than an awful terrible act of terrorism!!!.. Indeed I know someone who lost a work colleague on the 2nd plane to hit the Towers!. But the USA handled it terribly .... and it does make me think a lot about things. Such as that the Americans have aparently threatened to JAIL vital witnesses if they give information to the public. By vital I mean people such as air traffic control, firefighters, FBI agents. And also peices of the World Trade Centre and Aircraft parts have also "gone missing!". Which is all a bit too strange for me. It makes me think WHY?.... what have the USA got to hide???. I will write more to continue this as I continue to read.
Another thing that got to me this week, was the interview on tv of the American amb to the UK. Mr Rattle, he was quizzed on the news about "how the war on terror is progressing?"... and his reply?. "Oh its going very well, apart from two small attacks on London and Madrid". EXCUSE ME??. What a load of rubbish!. He obviously has not heard about the recent attacks on Turkey, earlier attacks on Indonesia, and countless others over the past year alone!!!. Still I guess this should not surprise me from the Americans!.
V
The beginning
The motivation for this blog is to rid the world of ignorance and remind the masses that no matter what you do or think, our destiny is written for us by a handful of elite capatilist's in a stronghold that, put gently...dangle carrots in the faces of the general public to avoid detection of their own corrupt agendas. The best way to tackle this is to confront it by giving facts for people to make up thier own minds. Media that is untouched by governing powers and dedicated to providing real, cutting issues using our freedom of speech as it should be. No Fox News or BBC News idealogy...Just hard hitting facts for your consideration....
R
Eugenics
I would recomend everyone take a look at this link, read it and take it all in.
Link to articleWhat is contained in it makes me feel very ill to think that the "great" USA were doing this and goodness knows to how many people!. The article is claiming that a young woman who was raped in 1968 in North Carolina and made pregnant .. however unknown to her at the time the North Carolina Eugenics board decided she was unfit to be a mother!... so they had her tubes tied so she'd never be a mum!. It was the very same Eugenics that the Nazis were practising in the 30s and 40s. It is even claimed in the article that the North Carolina officials were offering the people money off their taxes to keep quiet and allow this to happen. It is estimated that as many as 65.000 people (mostly African) were sterilized!.
V
