Reclaim The World

9-11 Documentary...

that is causing a split in opinion about the whole affair.

Make no mistake this video is a factual documentary of events regarding 9-11 and the incompetence of a Government hell bent on twisting the truth, although facts you cannot argue, some views are misrepresented. You have to appreciate that some believe that the airplanes over the Pentagon and Pennsyvania were shot down and rightly so given the correct intelligence, but the U.S. Government or any for that matter wouldn't publicly want to admit to certain acts of National Security because it's not exactly good publicity is it. Anyway i'm not going to critisize some good work. Worth watching....for your consideration.
Link to 911 Loose Change video

Or watch it here:


A report i have found from the U.S government to argue this is found here, but it's very weak and you can pull it apart at the seams . In fact it's so poor there is no knowledge of who it was that wrote this for the USINFO.STATE.ORG

By breaking down specifics about the allegations, who would be satisfied with the responce. Here are a few examples:

"The Attack on the Pentagon"
"Allegation: 9/11 Revealed suggests that American Airlines flight 77 was not hijacked and flown into the Pentagon but that, instead, “a drone Boeing 757 is used or a smaller, more manageable plane painted in American Airlines colors.”

US info's explanation: "This theory ignores the fact that the passenger and crew remains from American Airlines flight 77 were recovered at the Pentagon crash site."

Where is this proof? Sure there will be dead inside the Pentagon. None of the information has been made public. In fact here is what was released by officials,
and consider there were three cameras that could wrap this up. How about releasing that!

wikimedia.org:Pentagon_security_video.jpg

After watching this you start to understand that they have for one reason or another removed the most important parts of the footage.

Continued:

"A team of more than 100 forensic specialists and others identified 184 of the 189 people who died in the Pentagon attack (125 from the Pentagon and 64 onboard American Airlines flight 77)."

Only 64 people on board that morning.

"All but one of the passengers onboard American Airlines flight 77 was positively identified as a match with DNA samples provided by the families of the crash victims, as reported in the Washington Post on November 21, 2001. This provides irrefutable proof that American Airlines flight 77, not a drone or other aircraft, crashed into the Pentagon on September 11."

One passenger from the plane wasn't identified. Surely they mean was withheld...As quoted from the Washington Post

"The fifth unidentified victim was a passenger on the hijacked plane. A spokesman for the FBI declined to disclose the name of the victim."

Who's flogging who here? And why is an official government spokesperson taking information from the paper anyway? Surely they have better resources 'on tap' than the Washington Post. And what is the statement:

"This provides irrefutable proof that American Airlines flight 77, not a drone or other aircraft, crashed into the Pentagon"

Does it? The International information programs..The United States information organisation uses information as proof from a press article! Here's more:

"The Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers Allegation: 9/11 Revealed suggests that the collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) towers occurred because not the terrorists flew airliners filled with jet fuel into them, but because the towers were “pre-rigged with explosives.”

U.S. info's explanation:"Some 200 staff reviewed tens of thousands of documents, interviewed more than one thousand people, reviewed 7,000 segments of video footage and 7,000 photographs, analyzed 236 pieces of steel from the wreckage, performed laboratory tests and sophisticated computer simulations of the sequence of events that occurred from the moment the aircraft struck the towers until they collapsed. Its conclusion is that the twin towers collapsed because the impact of the planes severed and damaged support columns and dislodged fireproofing insulation coating the steel floor trusses and steel columns, which meant that the subsequent fire, which reached 1000 degrees Celsius, weakened the floors and columns to the point where they bowed and buckled, causing the towers to collapse."

The files that were allegedly in WTC7? 1000 degrees? The steel wouldn't be compromised with anything less than 2000. Now who is to know how much pressure the towers were under after planes flew into them, but to make assumptions that fireproofing was 'dislodged' beggars belief.

"Allegation: Other conspiracy theorists have claimed that the fact that the towers collapsed at near a "free fall" rate indicates that explosives were needed to cause this rapid a rate of collapse."

U.S. info's explanation:"Facts: This allegation ignores the fact that the enormous weight of the top portions of the towers completely overwhelmed the carrying capacity of the floors beneath them, which is what caused the towers to collapse at very close to a "free fall" rate. NIST's Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers states: The structure below the level of collapse initiation offered minimal resistance to the falling building mass .... The potential energy released by the downward movement of the large building mass far exceeded the capacity of the intact structure below to absorb that .... Since the stories below the level of collapse initiation provided little resistance to the tremendous energy released by the falling building mass, the building section above came down essentially in free fall .... As the stories below sequentially failed, the falling mass increased, further increasing the demand on the floors below, which were unable to arrest the moving mass. The falling mass of the building compressed the air ahead of it, much like the action of a piston, forcing material, such as smoke and debris, out the windows ...."

We all know that each floor, and there were a lot of them would have some inpact on the rate at which the floors fell in a free fall state.

The Collapse of World Trade Center 7 Allegation: 9/11 Revealed suggests that the 47-story World Trade Center 7 building, which collapsed at 5:20 pm on September 11, was intentionally demolished. The primary piece of evidence for this is a comment that Mr. Larry Silverstein, who owned the World Trade Center complex, made on the September 2002 television documentary American Rebuilds. Mr. Silverstein said: I remember getting a call from the Fire Department commander, telling me they were not sure they were going to be able to contain the fire. I said, you know, “We've had such terrible loss of life that the smartest thing to do is just pull it.” And they made that decision to pull it and we watched the [World Trade Center 7] building collapse. 9/11 Revealed and other conspiracy theorists put forward the notion that Mr. Silverstein’s suggestion to “pull it” is slang for intentionally demolishing the WTC 7 building.

Correct but not the opinion of the USinfo.state.org...

U.S. info's explanation:"Facts: On September 9, 2005, Mr. Dara McQuillan, a spokesman for Silverstein Properties, issued the following statement on this issue:Seven World Trade Center collapsed at 5:20 p.m. on September 11, 2001, after burning for seven hours. There were no casualties, thanks to the heroism of the Fire Department and the work of Silverstein Properties employees who evacuated tenants from the building. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) conducted a thorough investigation of the collapse of all the World Trade Center buildings. The FEMA report concluded that the collapse of Seven World Trade Center was a direct result of fires triggered by debris from the collapse of WTC Tower 1. In the afternoon of September 11, Mr. Silverstein spoke to the Fire Department Commander on site at Seven World Trade Center. The Commander told Mr. Silverstein that there were several firefighters in the building working to contain the fires. Mr. Silverstein expressed his view that the most important thing was to protect the safety of those firefighters, including, if necessary, to have them withdraw from the building. Later in the day, the Fire Commander ordered his firefighters out of the building and at 5:20 p.m. the building collapsed. No lives were lost at Seven World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. As noted above, when Mr. Silverstein was recounting these events for a television documentary he stated, “I said, you know, we've had such terrible loss of life. Maybe the smartest thing to do is to pull it.” Mr. McQuillan has stated that by “it,” Mr. Silverstein meant the contingent of firefighters remaining in the building."

What i find most alarming about this line:

"Mr. Dara McQuillan, a spokesman for Silverstein Properties, issued the following statement on this issue:... Mr. Silverstein was recounting these events for a television documentary he stated, “I said, you know, we've had such terrible loss of life. Maybe the smartest thing to do is to pull it.” Mr. McQuillan has stated that by “it,” Mr. Silverstein meant the contingent of firefighters remaining in the building."

So basically were getting everyone out and are going to watch it fall down naturally which is coincedently not too long from now seeing as it only burned for 7 hours. 7 whole hours! Here's the video footage of this Silverstein's statement:

blindnation.wordpress.com-the-landlord-larry-silverstein

Here's who occupied the building: wtc7.net/background

And here's how it fell: whatreallyhappened.wtc7

More:

Insider Trading Allegation: 9/11 Revealed repeats long-standing rumors of “insider trading [based] on advance warnings of the attack.”

U.S. info's explanation:"Facts: The 9/11 Commission examined this issue in detail, stating, in The 9/11 Commission Report (p. 499): Highly publicized allegations of insider trading in advance of 9/11 generally rest on reports of unusual pre-9/11 trading activity in companies whose stock plummeted after the attacks. Some unusual trading did in fact occur, but each such trade proved to have an innocuous explanation. For example, the volume of put options – investments that pay off only when a stock drops in price – surged in the parent companies of United Airlines [UAL] on September 6 and American Airlines on September 10 – highly suspicious trading on its face. Yet, further investigation has revealed that the trading had no connection with 9/11. A single U.S.-based institutional investor with no conceivable ties to al Qaeda purchased 95 percent of the UAL puts on September 6 as part of a trading strategy that also included buying 115,000 shares of American on September 10. Similarly, much of the seemingly suspicious trading in American on September 10 was traced to a specific U.S.-based options trading newsletter, faxed to its subscribers on Sunday, September 9, which recommended these trades. These examples typify the evidence examined by the investigation. The SEC [Security and Exchange Commission] and the FBI [Federal Bureau of Investigation], aided by other agencies and the securities industry, devoted enormous resources to investigating this issue, including securing the cooperation of many foreign governments. These investigators have found that the apparently suspicious consistently proved innocuous."

And there's nothing remotely disturbing about these deals or newsletters?

"A single U.S.-based institutional investor with no conceivable ties to al Qaeda purchased 95 percent of the UAL puts on September 6 as part of a trading strategy that also included buying 115,000 shares of American on September 10. Similarly, much of the seemingly suspicious trading in American on September 10 was traced to a specific U.S.-based options trading newsletter, faxed to its subscribers on Sunday, September 9, which recommended these trades."

Suspicious trading would be one way of putting it... Being the whole foundation of the U.S.A And let's not forget.
There were supposedly 64 people on American Airlines flight 77 that morning. Take away 6 crew members and 5 terrorists leaves you with 53 passengers on a plane that can handle a maximum of 200 (200 incl crew). Sound investment if this flight is anything to go by.

R

posted by Reclaim The World @ 7:56 pm